The growing popularity of ‘dupes’ and products inspired by well-known brands shows that even the food sector is not devoid of this trend. 🛒✨
An example would be J. M. Smucker Company v Trader Joe’s Company case, which concerned the infringement of the appearance of the Uncrustables product. 🥪🚫
One example of such a situation is the case of L’Oréal v Bellure NV (C-487/07), which concerned, among other things, comparative advertising of cheaper perfumes that directly or indirectly “suggested” to consumers that they were equivalent to well-known products.
The answer is a resounding YES. In the world of Intellectual Property, there is a concept known as “Riding on the Coattails” (or Free Riding).
How has Jägermeister maintained its strong market position for years? It makes every effort to protect its trademarks and its reputation!
lim Shady case is not the first time Eminem has ended up in a legal dispute!
The previous case concerned Eminem in the context of sales and licensing contracts for music downloads and other downloadable copyrighted material.
The “Parody Paradox” is one of the most misunderstood areas of trademark law. While the law protects free speech and humor, it doesn’t give you a free pass to use another brand’s fame to sell your own products.
We are part of KBZ Żuradzki Barczyk & Partners Advocates and Attorneys-at-law LP, a member of The Association Of Idependent European Lawyers.
17 Zabrska Street, 40-083 Katowice, Poland
Court Registry Number 0000953480
Privacy Policy
© All Rights Reserved.