Mercedes vs. Sany: Why Trademark Protection Requires More Than Registration

In order to protect its brand, Mercedes often engages in intellectual property disputes.

One example is the dispute between Mercedes-Benz and Sany- a Chinese manufacturer of construction machinery. This case concerned the infringement of the Mercedes trademark, but the Court ruled that the three-pointed star trademark is not infringed by a similar three-pointed star trademark owned by Sany, further stating that there is no ‘link’ made by the average consumer between the two logos which would lead to a ‘clear exploitation on the coat-tails of the mark with a reputation’.

Starbucks Refiles Trademarks in Russia: Comeback or Legal Safeguard?

Starbucks has taken a significant legal step in Russia, formally re-registering its core trademarks with the intellectual property office, Rospatent. The filing secures Starbuck’s brand – including the names “Starbucks Coffee” ☕ and “Frappuccino” – for services covering cafes, instant coffee, and loyalty programs until 2034. 🛡️

Can Radiator Grilles Be Trademarks? Mercedes Proves They Can

In 2023, Mercedes applied to the EUIPO to register the following EU figurative trademark covering classes 12 and 28 for car radiator grilles, games and toys, but it was partially rejected on the basis that it depicts the goods and is non-distinctive. 🙅‍♀

Lacoste Wins 23-Year Logo Battle: Why Trademark Protection Matters

After 23 years of litigation, the Delhi High Court ruled in favour of Lacoste in its battle with Crocodile International, prohibiting its competitor from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, advertising or using the disputed trademark in any manner that constitutes infringement of Lacoste’s trademark rights.